Offshore Wind Farm Operations
Complete operational reference for building Miradoris: participants, roles, software, hardware, and real-world examples across EU and US markets.
1. Bird's Eye View: The Operational Map
An offshore wind farm is not a single site. It is a distributed system spanning three geographic zones, each with different people, equipment, and constraints. Think of it as a supply chain that runs across land and sea, 24/7, for 25+ years.
The Three Zones
2. Who's Who: Organizations & Stakeholders
Every offshore wind farm involves a web of companies with overlapping responsibilities. Understanding who does what is critical for knowing where Miradoris would sit in their workflows.
EU: Orsted, Equinor, RWE, Vattenfall, SSE Renewables, EDP Renewables, Iberdrola
US: Orsted, Avangrid/Iberdrola, Dominion Energy, Equinor,
Major players: Siemens Gamesa (now Siemens Energy), Vestas, GE Vernova (Haliade-X), Goldwind, MingYang
Responsible for: availability targets, maintenance scheduling, personnel safety, vessel logistics, regulatory reporting.
The developer still operates/maintains these under contract, but ownership is separate. This creates interesting data-sharing dynamics.
EU: Windcat Workboats (CMB.TECH), ESVAGT, Bibby Marine, CWind, MHO-Co
US: Edison Chouest Offshore (ECO Edison
US vessels must comply with the Jones Act (built, crewed, and owned American).
Key companies: Vissim, Shoreline Wind, WINDEA, SeaRoc (Miros Group), IBS Software, Systematic, Royal Dirkzwager, James Fisher Marine Services
UK: National Grid ESO • DE: TenneT, 50Hertz • DK: Energinet • US: ISO New England, PJM, NYISO
They dictate grid code compliance, curtailment instructions, and reactive power requirements.
US:
Training standards:
3. Roles and Daily Realities
Every person listed below is a potential Miradoris user, or someone whose work feeds data into the platform.
| Role | Location | What They Actually Do | Tools They Use Today | Key Pain Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operations Manager | Onshore HQ / O&M Base | Owns availability targets (typically 95%+), approves work plans, manages budgets, makes go/no-go decisions for offshore work based on weather windows. | Data scattered across 5+ systems. No single view of "what's happening right now." Decisions made on phone calls and gut feel. | |
| Offshore Coordinator | O&M Base (control room) | The central nervous system. Tracks every person, vessel, and helicopter. First point of contact for emergencies. The "air traffic controller" of the wind farm. | Marine coordination software (Vissim, Shoreline, SeaRoc), | Multiple screens, multiple systems. Manually cross-referencing vessel positions with weather with certifications. High cognitive load. |
| Marine Coordinator | O&M Base / offshore on | Plans vessel logistics: which | Marine management software, vessel booking systems, weather routing tools, spreadsheets | Vessel sharing between contractors is manual. Route optimization barely exists. Weather-driven replanning is reactive. |
| Wind Turbine Technician | Offshore (nacelle, tower, transition piece) | Hands-on workforce. Scheduled maintenance (oil changes, filter swaps, bolt torquing), unscheduled repairs, inspections. Climbs 100m+ towers in rough weather. | Mobile | Work orders arrive incomplete. Can't see parts availability before leaving port. Limited connectivity offshore. Paper forms still common. |
| Onshore control room | Monitors real-time turbine performance 24/7. Responds to alarms, starts/stops turbines remotely, implements curtailment instructions from grid operator. | OEM SCADA (Siemens, Vestas, GE proprietary), alarm management, event logbooks | Alarm fatigue (hundreds/day, most low-priority). SCADA is OEM-locked. Each OEM has different interface. | |
| Condition Monitoring Analyst | Onshore (remote/centralized) | Interprets vibration data, oil analysis, temperature trends from | ||
| O&M Base + offshore visits | Safety compliance, permit-to-work systems, risk assessments, emergency response plans, incident investigation, certification tracking ( | Permit-to-work systems, incident reporting tools, training databases | Certification tracking across hundreds of techs + multiple contractors is a nightmare. Hard to get real-time visibility into who is qualified for what. | |
| Logistics Coordinator | Onshore | Manages spare parts inventory, orders components, coordinates heavy-lift campaigns (blade replacements, gearbox swaps). Arranges warehousing and transport. | Lead times for major components 6-12 months. No real-time inventory visibility across sites. Demand forecasting is guesswork. | |
| Data / Performance Analyst | Onshore (centralized) | Calculates | PI System (OSIsoft), Python/R scripts, PowerBI, | Data quality issues everywhere. SCADA data has gaps. Manual cleaning consumes enormous time. No standardized data model across OEMs. |
| Emergency Response Coordinator | O&M Base | Maintains emergency response plans. Coordinates with coastguard, | Emergency response plans (documents), comms systems, | In emergency: need instant visibility of who is where, closest vessel, weather, who has medical training. Info is spread across multiple systems. |
4. Software and Systems Stack
The technology landscape in offshore wind is a patchwork. No single platform covers everything. This is both the problem and the opportunity.
How Data Flows (and Where It Breaks)
Key Software Details
Critical detail: SCADA is almost always provided by the turbine
Protocols:
IBM Maximo dominates the utility/energy sector. Heavy, expensive, 18+ month implementations. Mobile interface is famously bad.
SAP PM used when the operator's parent company is already on SAP. Field technicians hate the interface.
Newer entrants like Fiix, UpKeep target the usability gap, but lack scale and compliance features.
Shoreline Wind (Danish): strong in simulation and optimization. Used by Orsted. Claims 10%
IBS Software: "Logistics Control Tower" with AI-driven supply chain optimization.
Providers: MeteoGroup, DTN, Vaisala, StormGeo, Meteologica
Key parameters:
A missed weather window means a turbine stays offline, losing ~$1,000-2,000/day per turbine.
5. Mechanical Systems and Physical Assets
WTG Components
Modern offshore turbines are machines the size of skyscrapers. The Haliade-X 13
| Component | Function | Failure Modes | Maintenance | Cost / Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blades (3x) | Capture wind energy. Composite fiberglass/carbon fiber, 80-115m long each. | Leading edge erosion, lightning strikes, delamination, bonding failures | Drone + rope access inspection, coating repair, blade exchange with jack-up for major damage | Replacement: $200-500K/blade + vessel ($150-300K/day jack-up). Erosion repair: $10-30K. |
| Pitch System | Rotates each blade individually to control power and loads. | Hydraulic leaks, bearing wear, control system faults | Oil/filter changes, bearing greasing, software updates | Common cause of unplanned downtime. Bearing replacement requires crane vessel. |
| Gearbox | Steps up rotation from ~10 | Bearing fatigue, gear tooth wear, oil degradation. Most expensive component failure. | Oil sampling, | Replacement: $500K-1.5M + vessel costs. 6-12 month lead time. |
| Generator | Converts mechanical rotation to electricity. Permanent magnet or doubly-fed induction. | Winding insulation failure, bearing wear, cooling system faults | Thermal monitoring, vibration analysis, insulation resistance testing | Replacement comparable to gearbox in cost and logistics. |
| Main Bearing | Supports the main shaft. Single or double arrangement. | Roller/raceway damage, lubrication failure. Failure = total shutdown. | Grease sampling, | Requires nacelle disassembly. Major campaign event. |
| Yaw System | Rotates the entire nacelle to face the wind. Electric motors with ring gear. | Yaw bearing wear, motor failure, cable twist | Greasing, bolt torque checks, yaw brake pad inspection | Misalignment causes 1-3% energy loss even without failure. |
| Power Converter | Converts variable-frequency AC to grid-compatible AC. | Thermal imaging, filter cleaning, module replacement | Modular design allows section replacement without full unit swap. | |
| Transformer | Steps up voltage from ~690V to collection system voltage (33-66 | Insulation breakdown, oil leaks, overheating | Oil sampling, dissolved gas analysis, thermal monitoring | In nacelle or tower base. Replacement is a major lift operation. |
| Foundation | Monopile (most common), jacket, gravity base, or floating (emerging). | Scour (seabed erosion), corrosion, fatigue cracking at welds | Failure is catastrophic but extremely rare. Scour protection (rock armour) is standard. | |
| Subsea Cables | Inter-array (33-66 | Anchor damage, cable burial loss, insulation failure | Burial depth surveys ( | Most costly offshore wind risk. Repair takes months with specialist cable vessel. |
| Collects power, transforms to export voltage. Contains switchgear, transformers, diesel backup. | Transformer failure, switchgear fault, cooling failure, fire | Periodic manned inspections, remote monitoring, fire suppression | Single point of failure for entire farm. Loss = total generation loss for connected turbines. |
6. Real-World Wind Farms: EU vs US
EU: Mature Market
Hornsea 2: 165 x SG 8
Hornsea 3: Under construction, 231 x SG 14-236
O&M Base: Port of Tyne. Control room monitoring 5% of UK electricity. 400+ permanent roles.
Operations: SSE leads development, Equinor operates long-term. World's first unmanned
O&M base: Helgoland island and Esbjerg (DK). Long transit =
Germany has the most complex multi-developer, multi-grid-platform coordination challenge in the world.
US: Emerging Market
12 x SG 11
ECO Edison (first US-built
Notable incident: GE blade failure July 2024 sent fiberglass debris onto Nantucket beaches. Manufacturing defect. Operations suspended until Jan 2025. GE Vernova paid $10.5M settlement.
When complete, largest US offshore wind farm. CREST Wind JV building a purpose-built
All US projects must navigate Jones Act constraints, creating bottlenecks vs. mature EU vessel fleet.
Maturity: EU has 30+ years of experience (first farm: Vindeby, Denmark, 1991). US is in year 1-2 of utility-scale ops.
Vessel fleet: EU has a deep, specialized fleet. US building from scratch under Jones Act.
Regulations: EU has established frameworks. US involves
O&M ecosystem: EU has mature third-party service market. US is building everything simultaneously.
7. Vessels, Access, and Logistics
Getting people and parts to turbines is the single biggest operational constraint. Weather, distance, and vessel availability determine how much maintenance you can actually perform.
Operators: Windcat (60+ vessels), CWind, Seacat, High Speed Transfers, Northern Offshore Services
Typical day: Depart 06:00, transit 1-3 hrs, transfer technicians, wait on station, recover, return.
For farms >2 hours from port,
Key feature: Motion-compensated gangway (Uptime, Ampelmann) for walk-to-work transfer in
US first: ECO Edison (Edison Chouest Offshore), 80m, 60 pax. Christened May 2024 for Orsted's NE projects.
Providers: CHC Helicopter, Bristow, NHV, HeliService International
Tracking:
Key vessels: Voltaire (Jan De Nul), Orion (DEME), Wind Osprey, Aeolus
Day rate: $150,000-300,000+/day. Booked years in advance. Major campaigns batch multiple turbines per mobilization.
8. Pain Points and Coordination Gaps
Each one is a Miradoris feature opportunity.
Decisions made by mentally merging information. Slow, error-prone, doesn't scale.
Done by experienced coordinators in their heads, using phone calls and whiteboard-level planning. No dynamic rescheduling engine.
Automated pipelines exist in theory but rarely fully implemented.
"Who is currently qualified for Task X on Turbine Y" rarely answered automatically.
Each contractor uses their own systems. Information sharing via email and spreadsheets.
9. Implications for Miradoris
Primary User: The Offshore/Marine Coordinator
This role is the natural home for an RTS-style command interface. They already think in terms of: map view, moving assets, time windows, resource allocation, and prioritization under constraints.
A single-pane-of-glass overlaying turbine status (
Core Operational Loops
Daily dispatch: Given today's weather, maintenance backlog, vessel availability, and crew certifications, generate an optimized dispatch plan. Allow drag-and-drop adjustment on a map.
Dynamic replanning: When weather changes mid-day, automatically suggest alternatives. "Wind farm A inaccessible at 14:00. Move CTV-2 to cluster B, reassign technicians."
Fleet view: For operators with multiple farms — portfolio-level view showing underperformance, bottleneck tasks,
Emergency mode: One-click view: all
Integration Architecture
Miradoris doesn't need to replace
Ingest from:
Push to:
Key standards:
Value Quantification
Availability improvement: Every 1% availability increase on a 1
Vessel cost optimization:
Safety improvement: Reduced incidents = reduced insurance, regulatory burden, reputational damage.
Headcount efficiency: Shoreline Wind claims 10%
Competitive Positioning
Vissim = marine coordination specialist (strong, but limited to marine/logistics layer)
Shoreline Wind = simulation and O&M optimization (strong analytics, more planning tool than real-time
IBS Software = logistics control tower (supply chain focus, less real-time)
The gap: nobody is doing real-time, integrated, spatial command-and-control that unifies
Watch Out For
Cybersecurity: Offshore wind is critical national infrastructure.
Connectivity: Offshore comms are constrained (4G/LTE, microwave, satellite). Mobile interfaces need offline capability.
Conservatism: Safety-critical and conservative industry. Must integrate with existing systems, not replace them. Prove value on a single farm first.
Reference compiled February 2026. Sources: Orsted, Equinor, SSE Renewables, Vineyard Wind, NREL, Carbon Trust OWA, Business Norway, industry job postings and technical documentation.